Nurturing employees’ work life balance in a meaningful workplace

After two years in the military, Russian novelist Fyodor Dostoevsky left to pursue a career as a writer. His writing was known for capturing the torment and happiness of the human soul and he also had strong opinions regarding work.

“Deprived of meaningful work, men and women lose their reason for existence; they go stark, raving mad.” — Fyodor Dostoevsky

We certainly work a lot and while most of us have not gone off the deep end, we’re certainly struggling as a society to better balance our work life and strive for more meaning at work.  How many of us truly embrace work as vocation? It’s a question rarely asked. And if employees and corporate chiefs started thinking of ways to provide a canvas for more meaningful workplaces – would it impact productivity?

Reframing How and Where We Work

Professor and Organizational Development expert Neal Chalofsky PhD addresses those questions in his new book, Meaningful Workplaces: Reframing How and Where We Work (Jossey-Bass 2010). His book is based on years of research which explore how some Human Resource driven programs impacted workplace culture, by focusing on a humanistic approach to organizational effectiveness. That means nurturing employees and recognizing their work life needs.

He offers a retrospective on how we’ve traditionally worked; the extreme overworked culture which has been acceptable up until now. But even with high unemployment, the traditional view is changing at the speed of light with Gen Y debating the attributes of working 9-5, Boomers rethinking their life skills and potentially switching careers, and many of us wondering, “why can’t I have a more fulfilling work life?”

But this book is not just another, “bring your whole self to work” book on exalting the human spirit in the workplace. It’s based on case studies and Chalofsky’s own experiences working for the government and in academia. And Chalofsky doesn’t dwell in the land of the white collar worker, he visits the hourly wage earners in car plants, working mothers trying to strike a work life balance, employees at insurance firms and the call center workers in the airline industry, among others.

It’s not just about perks

“First of all it’s not just about the perks, it’s about the overall culture, ” says Chalofsky in his book. He goes on to explain that there are benefits in shifting to a more humanized work life culture, because the company culture essentially values the employee, a departure from the “almighty dollar” approach he describes:

“Our culture has put human development in the service of economic development. Learning, skill development and the mastery of talent are more about increasing one’s ability to be more productive or make money than about developing one’s human potential. ”

Chalofsky argues that when the employee is embraced in a humane workplace, a climate is created which not only supports the growth of employee, but also creates a community in which the workers want to take on the commitment of loyalty to the company. He contends it makes for more engaged employees who share common values with the mission of the company, thus creating a pool of more productive employees.

Managing the tensions of work life balance issues

Chalofsky spends a good chunk of time on employees work life concerns. He cites a number of studies over the last decade which still demonstrate that work life balance employee assistance programs continue to be a hot potato which some companies embrace, but others give lip service as they see it as a money drainer. He examines flexible work arrangements, Results Only Work Environments and Mass Career Customization. He is neither advocate or opposition, he looks at both sides of the coin.

The Benefits of a Meaningful Workplace

Chalofsky says there is a need for more meaningful workplaces, and offers stats based on research done by the Society for Human Resource Management to present his argument. Among them, increased global competitiveness, demographic changes which might lead to a shortage of high-skilled workers, the aging of the workforce, and boomers making greater demand for work life balance. All of these factors are already impacting the workplace. Clearly, there needs to be more attention and awareness of the changing workforce.

The author is extraordinarily thorough in his research. I know this as I’ve been covering work life culture for much of the last decade. And the elements of a meaningful workplace are well thought out. While academic in nature, Chalofsky’ book is an easy read with some great anecdotes.  My only disappointment with this book is the prohibitive price. I hope that the $45 dollar cover price doesn’t dissuade potential buyers because the material is very much a blueprint for a new way of making work – work in a company setting.

The Elements of a Meaningful Workplace

In closing, derived from Chalofsky’s studies, here are the prevalent themes in a meaningful workplace.

  1. Living a values-based culture
  2. Caring about employees
  3. Caring about the organizational mission
  4. Work, play and community involvement

Chalofsky’s Elements of a Meaningful Workplace:

  1. Values-Based Organizational Cultures, including Leadership and Work Life Issues
  2. Social responsibility and Diversity
  3. Employee Engagement and Commitment, and the Workplace as a Community

Which of these themes resonates with you? Are some topics too far off the interest of the corporate spreadsheets to be recognized as bottom-line concerns? How would you define a meaningful workplace? Would a more meaningful workplace impact productivity? Please share your thoughts.

  • Pingback: 50 Blog Posts Every Business Leader Should Bookmark | Online Degree Programs.com

    • http://www.judymartinspeaks.com Judy Martin

      Thrilled to be included here for sure.

  • http://Moravecglobal.com Milan Moravec

    Nurturing employees with 21st century employee loyalty. Companies are into a phase of creative disassembly where reinvention and adjustments are constant. Hundreds of thousands of jobs are being shed by Boeing, GE, Chevron, Sam’s Club, Wells Fargo Bank, HP, Starbucks etc. and the state, counties and cities. Even solid world class institutions like the University of California Berkeley under the leadership of Chancellor Birgeneau & Provost Breslauer are firing staff, faculty and part-time lecturers. Yet many employees, professionals and faculty cling to old assumptions about one of the most critical relationship of all: the implied, unwritten contract between employer and employee.
    Until recently, loyalty was the cornerstone of that relationship. Employers promised job security and a steady progress up the hierarchy in return for employees fitting in, performing in prescribed ways and sticking around. Longevity was a sign of employeer-employee relations; turnover was a sign of dysfunction. None of these assumptions apply today. Organizations can no longer guarantee employment and lifetime careers, even if they want to.
    Organizations that paralyzed themselves with an attachment to “success brings success’ rather than “success brings failure’ are now forced to break the implied contract with employees – a contract nurtured by management that the future can be controlled.
    Jettisoned employees are finding that the hard won knowledge, skills and capabilities earned while being loyal are no longer valuable in the employment market place.
    What kind of a contract can employers and employees make with each other? The central idea is both simple and powerful: the job or position is a shared situation. Employers and employees face market and financial conditions together, and the longevity of the partnership depends on how well the for-profit or not-for-profit continues to meet the needs of customers and constituencies. Neither employer nor employee has a future obligation to the other. Organizations train people. Employees develop the kind of security they really need – skills, knowledge and capabilities that enhance future employability.
    The partnership can be dissolved without either party considering the other a traitor. Employee loyalty to management is dead. Employees and management require a Rx to reform employee loyalty.

    • http://www.judymartinspeaks.com Judy Martin

      Milan,
      I agree with what you suggest here – an equally beneficial partnership between employee and employer is the ideal, but how do we get there?
      Some would say that’s a pretty tall order in today’s environment. I do think however that if companies are going to retain their top talent when the economy rebounds that’s going to be high on the list. So how should companies begin the process? This requires a complete cultural shift.. also one that values the human condition above all else as the well from which profits subsequently spring from.. again a rough ride ahead I think. Would love to hear more about your thoughts on this.